Comments
Thank you Bruce and the TRAO Board for posting various updates and info about the COVID battles. As well as on all the other items TRAO is working toward.
Has anyone used TowLien.com to start the process on vehicles not picked up? or do you use something different? Thanks!
Thanks for the cookie cutter at the Midwest Regional Tow Show! Burnworth’s Garage, Uniontown, PA
I have not received any information regarding the shipping information for my order, I responded by email but I’m not sure if it went to spam can you please advise.
TRAO is supporting HB384, a bill that would reduce the number of certified mailings required on private property tows from the current 3 certified mailings to 1, as it was for 30 years prior to SB 274. That is all the bill does. The used car dealers asked us to add mailing 1 regular stamp mailing to the bill. We agreed. It is a simple bill designed to save towers in our industry money, time, labor, and confusion. It will help keep towing companies compliant with the law by simplifying it. The bill does not change how long we must keep the car b4 filing for it, or anything else, just the number of certified mailings. The bill is currently in committee. In the entire state of Ohio, the only 2 who have opposed the bill are Senator Hughes, who is responsible for SB274, which he called the "predatory towing bill," and the other Ohio towing association, APTO.
If u are a member of APTO, please call your board of directors and convince them that they should support this bill, which will do nothing but save the members of our industry time, money, and aggravation.
I have spoken to several members of the APTO board and they say they are opposing this bill because that is what their members voted to do. I spoke to many APTO members who said they would never vote to oppose this bill.
I have listened to the APTO talking points. They say we are opening up a chance for legislators to add amendments that will hurt us. I have been assured by our lobbyist that will not happen. They say we shouldn't ask to have this changed because we agreed to it in HB 341. It was put in place in SB 274, which we all agree was not entirely in the towers best interest. We have already and continue to change some of the negative things that have come out of that bill. APTO board members say the towers are getting a raise, as soon as the PUCO approves it. So, this bill makes the towers look greedy, because we do not want to spend an extra $30 to $40 on the 2 extra certified mailings required to obtain an unclaimed title. First of all, the raise is not enough, as I, Tim Duffy, and the APTO attorney testified to in front of the PUCO hearing last week. The APTO attorney actually used the required new 3 letter mailing as evidence that we should receive a larger raise. The fact that we haven't received a raise in over 18 years, the extra requirements, and necessary expense of new technology, should be enough reason to keep us from looking greedy.
APTO board members say, APTO, (try to remember TRAO helped write the entire bill and helped get HB 341 passed) got the destruction only title put into law. The APTO board members say, " Just use the destruction only process to get your titles. It only requires 1 notice." What they don't tell u is, the law states the vehicle must be "impossible" to restore, in order to obtain a title for a vehicle this way. A low percentage of the vehicles we tow are "impossible" to repair. Most would cost way too much money to repair, but that is not the way the law is written. I fought against that language before HB 341 passed.
Another reason APTO board members give is this is a consumer protection issue. They don't tell u, this bill changes nothing about the length of time required to store the vehicle. If someone is missing a car, he/she knows his/her car is gone. If he/she can not find the vehicle, he/she can call the police, the towing company is required to call the impound into the police. If someone else had the car, one certified mail is enough, 2 and 3 notifications changes nothing. The law says you can file 60 days after the owner & lienholder receive the 1st notification.
It is my opinion( only an opinion) the reason APTO is opposing this bill is because they had nothing to do with it, so it will be harder for them to take full credit for getting it passed. In turn, if the bill fails, APTO will be able to say TRAO can not get a bill passed.
This is such a simple and harmless bill, the only reason it might not pass would be because Ohio's other towing association, APTO, is opposing it.
So, if you are an APTO member, ask your association to do what is best for the industry and support this bill, which will help its members and most towing companies in the industry. This is a chance to pass a good bill. Leave the egos at home. Don't just "not support" the bill, which was their earlier stance, until they saw the bill moving forward. Now APTO is actively opposing the bill.
At the very least, demand your board of directors send a vote out to the members and let the members decide whether to support a bill that will save them money, time, and aggravation.
Harry Johns HELL YOU CALLL THEM A BOUT A ROOM THEY WONT CALL YOU BACK THATS WRONG
My name is Karen Ross... I have 3 question...Is there a law a towing company have to do a title search on car within 72 hours of towing the car? Are there different fees for car tow off a private property in Kentucky vs.Ohio if SD o what are they? Finally is there a law in cinti & Ohio that business has to post there fees to the public? Thank you for assistance. My phone I can be contact is (859)912-8405
One question I have is this legal to haul a vehicle like this on a rollback and if not where do I find the law or code either Ohio or fmcsa stating that it’s not
Any possibility of flatbeds heading to Texas empty connecting with state or local Farm Bureau to aid in transporting donated round bales to Texas farmers?