07/23/2026
A State Farm customer couldn't get their adjuster to return a phone call. Neither could the repair facility. The repair process was being delayed, so the customer reached out to their State Farm agent for help.
State Farm management was asked to do one simple thing: help their customer.
Mike Tomshack, State Farm's Estimatics Team Manager, never apologized for the lack of communication. He never said his adjuster would contact the customer. Instead, his very first response was to point out that the customer chose an "alternative workflow facility" and that what was happening "should not be a surprise."
Read that again.
A customer can't get a phone call returned and management's response is essentially, "Well, they didn't choose one of our preferred shops."
Consumers have the right to choose where their vehicle is repaired. Choosing an independent repair facility does not relieve State Farm of its obligation to communicate with its own customer.
Mike then goes on to explain that Toyota's safety inspection procedures simply require the necessary scans to be performed and that if no fault codes are present, the repair process should STOP.
There is one major problem with that statement.
Toyota doesn't say that.
Toyota's written repair procedures for this exact vehicle require multiple Supplemental Restraint System components to be removed from the vehicle for visual inspection, including airbags and other safety components. Toyota also states that when airbags have deployed, all airbag sensors in the damaged area anywhere repairs are necessary are to be replaced.
You cannot visually inspect components that Toyota requires to be removed from the vehicle without removing them from the vehicle.
This isn't our opinion. It's Toyota's.
So, we have a very simple question for you State Farm.
Was Mike Tomshack intentionally misrepresenting Toyota's repair procedures in an attempt to steer this customer away from their chosen repair facility?
Or is the State Farm manager responsible for making these decisions unfamiliar with the manufacturer's written repair procedures?
Because those are the only two explanations that make sense.
If he knew Toyota's procedures and said this anyway, that's a serious problem.
If he didn't know Toyota's procedures before advising his customer and criticizing the repair facility, that's also a serious problem.
Either way, State Farm owes this customer an explanation.
We will continue doing what we've always done, posting the documents, telling the truth, and letting consumers decide for themselves.
We only have our reputation, that's it. When we are called about a claim we shoot you straight, no bu****it. We can either help you or we can't and we play by the rules. When our day ends, we know we handled our clients' claims in a professional, fair, accurate and timely manner. Based on this email, it does not appear that State Farm subscribes to the same motto as we do.
Fair Claims.
Fair Montana.
Capital Collision Center State Farm Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance Montana Department of Justice Toyota USA TOYOTA CCC Intelligent Solutions SCRS - Society of Collision Repair Specialists Montana Collision Repair Association