24/04/2026
All to often with diagnosis work (especially trade work) I find a fault hidden away, take the measurements, gather the evidence, make the call, then move onto the next, leaving the teardown and repair to the someone else.
The hardest part of this is never seeing the end result, never hearing the outcome. Often when intrusive testing is avoided you're making that call off of electrical evidence only.
That was the case here, with a Nissan Xtrail i was called in to diagnose for a start stall condition. I was able to prove the EGR flow was excessive, despite the complete lack of fault codes, and without removing any pipework or valves, using the Scope and some compressed air.
When you understand the data, its clear! But to anyone unsure what they are seeing it leaves doubt when, like here, i have wiggly lines on a screen, and say 'the EGR valve is damaged' despite the lack of a fault code, and the scan tool data telling me it was moving, correctly. There was without doubt airflow through the EGR valve from the exhaust to the intake, even when the valve was 'closed'
I left with the recommendation to remove and inspect the valve, replace it if necessary.
On this occasion, however, i got this photo through after the Valve was removed..... and im sure you can agree its defiantly damaged and explains the excessive flow when closed!