03/04/2026
An Earth Award for replacing a natural, biodegradable material with petroleum-based plastic? I’d love to understand the logic.
I’ve been sitting with this for a few days. I don’t want to take anything away from someone’s success, and I don’t want this to come across as envy.
But when TIME Magazine posts a video on LinkedIn showing cattle while claiming that animals are killed for handbags, and then celebrates Stella McCartney’s Earth Award on Instagram to over 12 million followers, where she states that „billions of animals are slaughtered in the name of luxury, for handbags and shoes and jackets“ and that „toxic chemicals used in leather tanning seep into rivers and into human bodies,“ I can’t stay quiet.
No cow, sheep, or goat on this planet is killed for a handbag. That’s more than 99% of all animals used for leather. They are killed for meat. The hide is a byproduct. If it isn’t turned into leather, it becomes waste, rotting in landfills and creating even bigger environmental problems.
She’s not entirely wrong about the chemicals. Parts of this industry have real problems. But this same industry has developed solutions that don’t cause these problems. Not as a marketing move, but because millions of hides need to be processed responsibly. That pressure forced innovation: Metal-free tanning, plant-based tanning agents, closed-loop water systems. These exist today.
And has anyone looked at what goes into making polyester? Petroleum extraction, antimony trioxide as a catalyst, ethylene glycol, microplastic shedding with every wash. None of that seeps into rivers and the sea?
Her online shop. A handbag. £1,695. Main material: 100% polyester. That’s plastic. Luxury plastic, but plastic.
I respect the vision. I respect the search for alternatives. But as long as the actual products on the shelf are made of plastic at luxury prices while natural, biodegradable materials are being vilified on a stage in front of the world, something is deeply off.