08/22/2026
Another philosophical reflection borne of engine work. (Pic solely for attention.)
Engines obey strict physical laws. That makes them predictable: If built the same way, broken in the same way, and tuned the same way, they will perform the same way in the same environmental circumstances (within a stated margin of error).
Testing an engine on an engine dynamometer strips away all of the other variables that apply when the engine is installed and operated in a car. Repeatability, engine after engine, all built the same, perform the same, reliably, time and time again. It is amazingly emotionally comforting to have that epistemological certainty, to see physical laws at work and never changing. It instills an unprecedented peace in me.
Not so with people. You can know someone deeply or even intimately for most of your life and fail to predict accurately how they will act or respond in a given circumstance. Even if they have acted in accordance with a well-established disposition many times previously, they may very well act differently the next time. And sometimes, that’s because the person has changed, but sometimes is just because the person was weak (or strong) on a given occasion. With a human being, the variables are overwhelmingly numerous and diverse, and having to w**d through that epistemological thicket is the very core of skepticism. It is for me the strongest root for the neighboring trees of relativism and nihilism.
Struggling to conform people to an engine-like physical law is sheer folly and leads nowhere fast. All one can do is accept the inherent variability, recognize the old Biblical adage that some things are not within our power to control, and move on. Perhaps even revel in the diversity, however painful it may be on a given occasion. Like the shepherd biting the head of the serpent and the laughing hysterically in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, the movement has to be one of sheer will, solely from within.
Just a few meanderings on a decidedly psychologically unpeaceful Saturday morning away from the shop.
Be well, and go fast.
—Peter
PS: For the Kripke fans out there, note the inherent difference in the skepticism I outline above about predictions of personal action, on the one hand, and Kripke’s putative skepticism about how we know that X+X=2X for all rational values of “X”, on the other hand.